![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:18 • Filed to: SpaceX, Space, Falcon Heavy, Spacelopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
300 mph water impacts are bad for rockets, !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! . But that’s the launch contractor’s problem.
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:22 |
|
Just about any sort of 300mph impact is bad - especially with something heavy, like an ocean.
I sort of suspected it was lost when there was no “it’s okay guys!” announcement within the hour of the launch
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:22 |
|
big if true
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:22 |
|
doh... hokay.. some kinks to be worked out still
but on the whole that was a pretty damned impressive showing
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:28 |
|
The system still works perfectly for sending payloads to orbit.
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:33 |
|
im just saying it didnt work perfectly mate... im impressed as all hell by the results they got
02/06/2018 at 19:33 |
|
Yeah, since this was a test flight they used an older block 4 Falcon for the center stage. The future FH flights will use block 5.
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:45 |
|
“You know, if this Block 4 crashes, we get a huge insurance payout.”
“Go on...”
![]() 02/06/2018 at 19:52 |
|
So the whole thing did as well as any conventional booster system. It just failed the return landing part. More work to do, sure, but this still counts as a validation of the system, I would think.
![]() 02/06/2018 at 21:47 |
|
I will never forget the shots of the side boosters coming down in tandem..
02/06/2018 at 22:24 |
|
On the upside, SpaceX has a functioning anti - ship ICBM.
![]() 02/06/2018 at 22:52 |
|
my god
![]() 02/06/2018 at 22:52 |
|
Think of how many hours were spent making sure they would land at the same time, and not a few seconds apart.
![]() 02/06/2018 at 22:57 |
|
pyrotechnic ballet